NSE ScannerComparison · NSE · data 2026-11-01
Coromandel International Limited vs Navin Fluorine International Limited
In plain words
Size: Coromandel International Limited is about 1.1 times the market value of Navin Fluorine International Limited.
Valuation (P/E): Navin Fluorine International Limited 48.9 vs Coromandel International Limited 27.3.
Return on equity: Navin Fluorine International Limited 20.1% vs Coromandel International Limited 16.5%.
Profit growth over 3 years: Navin Fluorine International Limited 20.9% a year vs Coromandel International Limited -0.9% a year.
Debt to equity: Coromandel International Limited 0.52 vs Navin Fluorine International Limited 0.32.
Differences in the numbers, not a recommendation of either stock.
Side by side
| COROMANDEL | NAVINFLUOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹1,696 | ₹8,680 |
| Market cap | ₹50,013 cr | ₹44,517 cr |
| P/E | 27.3 | 48.9 |
| P/B | — | 10 |
| ROE | 16.5% | 20.1% |
| ROCE | -63.3% | 19.2% |
| Debt / equity | 0.52 | 0.32 |
| Operating margin | 7.9% | 30.3% |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 0.17% |
| Sales growth, 3 years (yearly) | 10.3% | 16.4% |
| Profit growth, 3 years (yearly) | -0.9% | 20.9% |
| 1-year return | -25.1% | 73.1% |
| Revenue, last 12 months | ₹32,602 cr | ₹4,066 cr |
| Net profit, last 12 months | ₹1,832 cr | ₹911 cr |
| Latest quarter | Jun 2026 | Sept 2026 |
| Quarter net profit | ₹382 cr | ₹269 cr |
| Quarter profit vs a year earlier | -24.4% | +81.5% |
| Promoter holding | 56.34% | 27.08% |
| Health check | Weak (3.9/10) | Strong (6.8/10) |
Common questions
Which has a higher P/E, Coromandel International Limited or Navin Fluorine International Limited?
Navin Fluorine International Limited trades at the higher P/E (48.9 against 27.3). A higher P/E means the market pays more for each rupee of past earnings; on its own it does not say which is better.
Which earns a higher return on equity?
Navin Fluorine International Limited (20.1% against 16.5%).
Which carries more debt?
Coromandel International Limited has the higher debt-to-equity ratio (0.52 against 0.32).