NSE ScannerComparison · NSE · data 2026-10-31
ECOS (India) Mobility & Hospitality Limited vs Laxmi India Finance Limited
In plain words
Size: ECOS (India) Mobility & Hospitality Limited is about 1.3 times the market value of Laxmi India Finance Limited.
Valuation (P/E): ECOS (India) Mobility & Hospitality Limited 10.2 vs Laxmi India Finance Limited 8.3.
Return on equity: ECOS (India) Mobility & Hospitality Limited 23.7% vs Laxmi India Finance Limited 13.8%.
Profit growth over 3 years: Laxmi India Finance Limited 46.1% a year vs ECOS (India) Mobility & Hospitality Limited 9.7% a year.
Debt to equity: Laxmi India Finance Limited 2.87 vs ECOS (India) Mobility & Hospitality Limited 0.03.
Differences in the numbers, not a recommendation of either stock.
Side by side
| ECOSMOBLTY | LAXMIINDIA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹100.32 | ₹90.83 |
| Market cap | ₹602 cr | ₹476 cr |
| P/E | 10.2 | 8.3 |
| P/B | — | 1 |
| ROE | 23.7% | 13.8% |
| ROCE | 26.2% | — |
| Debt / equity | 0.03 | 2.87 |
| Operating margin | 7.8% | 26.8% |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 0.00% |
| Sales growth, 3 years (yearly) | 24.1% | 34.8% |
| Profit growth, 3 years (yearly) | 9.7% | 46.1% |
| 1-year return | -53.3% | -41.4% |
| Revenue, last 12 months | ₹838 cr | ₹340 cr |
| Net profit, last 12 months | ₹59 cr | ₹57 cr |
| Latest quarter | Jun 2026 | Jun 2026 |
| Quarter net profit | ₹15 cr | ₹17 cr |
| Quarter profit vs a year earlier | +10.4% | +69.4% |
| Promoter holding | 67.79% | 60.17% |
| Health check | Average (6.4/10) | Average (5.9/10) |
Common questions
Which has a higher P/E, ECOS (India) Mobility & Hospitality Limited or Laxmi India Finance Limited?
ECOS (India) Mobility & Hospitality Limited trades at the higher P/E (10.2 against 8.3). A higher P/E means the market pays more for each rupee of past earnings; on its own it does not say which is better.
Which earns a higher return on equity?
ECOS (India) Mobility & Hospitality Limited (23.7% against 13.8%).
Which carries more debt?
Laxmi India Finance Limited has the higher debt-to-equity ratio (2.87 against 0.03).