Comparison · NSE · data 2026-11-01
Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. vs Thomas Cook (India) Limited
In plain words
Size: Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. is about 8.7 times the market value of Thomas Cook (India) Limited.
Valuation (P/E): Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. 25.1 vs Thomas Cook (India) Limited 18.3.
Return on equity: Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. 35% vs Thomas Cook (India) Limited 9.1%.
Profit growth over 3 years: Thomas Cook (India) Limited 223.5% a year vs Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. 11.5% a year.
Debt to equity: Thomas Cook (India) Limited 0.21 vs Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. 0.02.
Differences in the numbers, not a recommendation of either stock.
Side by side
| IRCTC | THOMASCOOK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹436.2 | ₹85.52 |
| Market cap | ₹34,908 cr | ₹4,024 cr |
| P/E | 25.1 | 18.3 |
| P/B | — | — |
| ROE | 35.0% | 9.1% |
| ROCE | 38.6% | 9.1% |
| Debt / equity | 0.02 | 0.21 |
| Operating margin | 29.8% | 2.9% |
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 0.58% |
| Sales growth, 3 years (yearly) | 13.8% | 18.5% |
| Profit growth, 3 years (yearly) | 11.5% | 223.5% |
| 1-year return | -40.3% | -47.5% |
| Revenue, last 12 months | ₹5,425 cr | ₹8,082 cr |
| Net profit, last 12 months | ₹1,393 cr | ₹219 cr |
| Latest quarter | Jun 2026 | Jun 2026 |
| Quarter net profit | ₹330 cr | ₹72 cr |
| Quarter profit vs a year earlier | -0.2% | -0.2% |
| Promoter holding | 62.40% | 64.77% |
| Health check | Average (5.9/10) | Average (5.3/10) |
Common questions
Which has a higher P/E, Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. or Thomas Cook (India) Limited?
Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. trades at the higher P/E (25.1 against 18.3). A higher P/E means the market pays more for each rupee of past earnings; on its own it does not say which is better.
Which earns a higher return on equity?
Indian Railway Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. (35.0% against 9.1%).
Which carries more debt?
Thomas Cook (India) Limited has the higher debt-to-equity ratio (0.21 against 0.02).